From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Provide function to get superblock and wait for it to thaw Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:13:25 +0000 Message-ID: <20120212211325.GT23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1328868181-16979-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <1328868181-16979-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner , mpatocka@redhat.com, Eric Sandeen To: Jan Kara Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1328868181-16979-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:03:00AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > In quota code we need to find a superblock corresponding to a device and wait > for superblock to be unfrozen. However this waiting has to happen without > s_umount semaphore because that is required for superblock to thaw. So provide > a function in VFS for this to keep dances with s_umount where they belong. Eww... All it takes is struct super_block *get_super_thawed(struct block_device *bdev) { while (1) { struct super_block *s = get_super(bdev); if (!s || s->s_frozen == SB_UNFROZEN) return s; up_read(&s->s_umount); vfs_check_frozen(s, SB_FREEZE_WRITE); put_super(s); } } and there's no need of extra arguments, etc. whatsoever. Both patches applied, with implementation of get_super_thawed() done as above.