From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:44:31 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@sdinet.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux-Kernel-Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.32.55+ printk_ratelimit()
Message-ID: <20120213214431.GA11443@kroah.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1202132148450.32459@aurora.sdinet.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1202132148450.32459@aurora.sdinet.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <stable.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:58:08PM +0100, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote:
> hello,
> 
> catching up with the stable kernel 2.6.32 I saw that 2.6.32.55 included 
> 8a64f33 "kernel.h: add printk_ratelimited and pr_<level>_rl"
> 
> Could it be that 2.6.32.x now also should get upstream 
> d8521fcc5e0ad3e79bbc4231bb20a6cdc2b50164 "printk_ratelimited(): fix 
> uninitialized spinlock" ?

Yes, I've now queued that one up, as well as another printk_ratelimit
fix that is needed.

thanks for letting me know.

greg k-h