From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NET: PHY names vs MDIO bus names regression fixes Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:00:27 +0100 Message-ID: <201202132300.27736.florian@openwrt.org> References: <1329132204-27946-1-git-send-email-florian@openwrt.org> <20120213.160204.622185887026096350.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:64676 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755732Ab2BMWAf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:00:35 -0500 Received: by wgbdt10 with SMTP id dt10so5298548wgb.1 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:00:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120213.160204.622185887026096350.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Le lundi 13 f=E9vrier 2012 22:02:04, David Miller a =E9crit : > From: Florian Fainelli > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:23:19 +0100 >=20 > > This patch serie aims at fixing the regressions introduced with the > > "use an unique MDIO bus name" patchset. Some drivers still formatte= d > > the PHY id to use the old bus name (e.g: "0" or "1") and therefore > > the PHY probing logic gets broken because their underlying MDIO bus > > name was changed too from "0" to -. > >=20 > > The offending patches got introduced during 3.3-rc1. >=20 > Then why the heck are you CC:'ing -stable on these patches? There was no reason, just some bad habit. >=20 > We're still in the 3.3-rcX phase, so there is no other tree in > the world these patches should be applied to. >=20 > In any event, for networking stuff, you shouldn't be adding > the stable CC: anyways, I take care of all networking stable > submissions myself. Allright, do you want me to resend these without the CC or are they oka= y as=20 is? --=20 =46lorian