From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=EDctor_M=2E_J=E1quez_L=2E?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: tidspbridge: enable watchdog by default Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:02:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20120215120249.GC24331@lit.local.igalia.com> References: <20120210203537.GG4141@mwanda> <20120215094357.GA24331@lit.local.igalia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp4.mundo-r.com ([212.51.32.151]:48996 "EHLO smtp4.mundo-r.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757787Ab2BOMCy (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:02:54 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Contreras Cc: "Ramirez Luna, Omar" , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Contreras , "Justin P. Mattock" , "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" , Jiri Kosina , Dan Carpenter , Greg KH On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 01:41:19PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > 2012/2/15 V=EDctor M. J=E1quez L. : > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:56:11PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Felipe Contreras > >> wrote: > >> >> When that case is applicable, we should first modify the loader= code > >> >> or prepare the baseimages to be common so we can get rid of spe= cific > >> >> loaders and just dump them into memory. > >> > > >> > I'd say the less workarounds, the better. > >> > >> If there are ever more base images compatible with the dsp, I woul= d > >> say that unifying them into a common format to be dumped in memory > >> isn't a workaround, and in that process we can get rid of the cust= om > >> loader code. > > > > Yes! please! and use Ohad's rproc thingy. >=20 > I thought rproc is tied to elf for now. It is. >=20 > > What would be the steps to unify that common format? I guess we wil= l depend on > > TI for that... Do we? >=20 > But this "common" format would be specific for tidspbridge, I don't > think it makes sense for these images to have that constraint. > Certainly rproc doesn't have it, and that one is not on staging. >=20 > In any case, the proposed patch looks good. We can deal about these > futuristic situations later on. I do agree. vmjl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html