From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, pjt@google.com, efault@gmx.de, venki@google.com,
suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: sched: Performance of Trade workload running inside VM
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:08:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120215173817.GD9918@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329326651.2293.151.camel@twins>
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [2012-02-15 18:24:11]:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 22:40 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > Ok ..let me see if these numbers highlight the problem better.
>
> does this translate like: I've no fscking clue,
I'd mentioned a possible reason earlier which is limiting VM1 to reach higher
utilization (which is the time it waits for cpu after wakeup):
>b. In the "all VMs active" case, VM1's vcpu tasks were found to incur
> "high" wait times when ttwo of VM1's tasks were scheduled on the same
> CPU (i.e a VCPU task had to wait behind a sibling VCPU task for
> obtaining CPU resource).
Let me get cpu wait time data and post it by tomorrow.
> but my tinker made it go away?
Do you have any other suggestions for me to try?
- vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-15 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-14 11:28 sched: Performance of Trade workload running inside VM Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-15 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-15 17:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-15 17:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-15 17:38 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2012-02-15 17:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-15 17:56 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-18 7:41 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-20 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-20 15:09 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-15 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120215173817.GD9918@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.