From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add clock part for EXYNOS5250 SoC Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:22:35 +0000 Message-ID: <201202160522.35249.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1328981685-8602-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <20120213205444.GH11077@ponder.secretlab.ca> <052801ccec5d$137aa460$3a6fed20$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:65369 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751214Ab2BPFWo (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:22:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <052801ccec5d$137aa460$3a6fed20$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: 'Grant Likely' , 'Russell King - ARM Linux' , 'Kyungmin Park' , 'Mark Brown' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, 'Thomas Abraham' , olof@lixom.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Mike Turquette' , jhbird.choi@samsung.com On Thursday 16 February 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Thanks for your sharing. > > OK, I and my team will follow up 'common struct clk' for exynos5250 > and it will be done maybe next week. And since I need to > implement other features for exynos5250 now, firstly let me use this > and test this series in linux-next in a day. Ok, sounds good to me. If you like, you could also send the patches that you expect to stay stable for inclusion into arm-soc, or send the entire series as a preliminary branch that I will put into arm-soc now and then replace when you are done with the remaining changes. As we discussed last week at Linaro Connect, we will start taking both stable and unstable branches into arm-soc now, whereas we used to take only stable branches. Anything that is not considered stable yet will be marked as a staging branch, e.g. staging/samsung/soc instead of samsung/soc. > Ah, one more, would be better to us if arm-soc tree could provide > the topic branch for 'common struct clk' working as a base. Good point. Mike, can you send a pull request for whatever you have now as another staging branch for arm-soc? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:22:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 03/11] ARM: EXYNOS: add clock part for EXYNOS5250 SoC In-Reply-To: <052801ccec5d$137aa460$3a6fed20$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1328981685-8602-1-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com> <20120213205444.GH11077@ponder.secretlab.ca> <052801ccec5d$137aa460$3a6fed20$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <201202160522.35249.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 16 February 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Thanks for your sharing. > > OK, I and my team will follow up 'common struct clk' for exynos5250 > and it will be done maybe next week. And since I need to > implement other features for exynos5250 now, firstly let me use this > and test this series in linux-next in a day. Ok, sounds good to me. If you like, you could also send the patches that you expect to stay stable for inclusion into arm-soc, or send the entire series as a preliminary branch that I will put into arm-soc now and then replace when you are done with the remaining changes. As we discussed last week at Linaro Connect, we will start taking both stable and unstable branches into arm-soc now, whereas we used to take only stable branches. Anything that is not considered stable yet will be marked as a staging branch, e.g. staging/samsung/soc instead of samsung/soc. > Ah, one more, would be better to us if arm-soc tree could provide > the topic branch for 'common struct clk' working as a base. Good point. Mike, can you send a pull request for whatever you have now as another staging branch for arm-soc? Arnd