From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: regression ioatdma 3.3
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:16:18 -0600
Message-ID: <20120220181618.GD17566@burratino>
References: <CAJ75kXZ-2vWZpG7Uz3firg6ew4y_DdorXotkAkUGSK0GWLMUQQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120127144737.GA27750@andromeda.dapyr.net>
	<20120219223125.GA820@burratino>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120219223125.GA820@burratino>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@darnok.org>
Cc: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, William Dauchy <wdauchy@gmail.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

>> Do you see this if you run a 64-bit dom0?

Looks like no.  Thomas reports[1]:

> I just tried with the amd64 kernel and Xen, and I didn't see any issue.
>
> However, it is important that Xen 4.1 + Linux 3.2 works with a 32 bits
> kernel, because that is the most optimized configuration (eg: 64 bits
> hypervisor, 32 bits kernel and 32 bits userland).

Maybe Andres's patches are relevant.

Hope that helps,
Jonathan

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/660554#25