From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] xfs: add back fdatasync support
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:23:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120221052301.GO3592@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120221003907.518904261@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:38:32PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add an in-memory only flag to say we logged timestamps only, and use it to
> check if fdatasync can optimize away the log force.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Looks good. Couple of minor things below.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> +/*
> + * The timestamps in the core are dirty, but not nessecarily anything
necessarily
> + * else.
> + *
> + * This is an incore only value store in ilf_fields & co, which must
> + * never make it to disk, unlike the other fields above.
That comment is a bit incoherent. Perhaps:
* this is an incore-only flag stored in ili_fields which, unlike
* the above flags, must never make it to disk in the ilf_fields.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-21 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-21 0:38 [PATCH 0/8] log all inode updates V2 Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-21 0:38 ` [PATCH 1/8] xfs: use per-filesystem I/O completion workqueues Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-21 4:58 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-28 16:13 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-02-21 0:38 ` [PATCH 2/8] xfs: do not require an ioend for new EOF calculation Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-28 16:14 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-02-21 0:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] xfs: make xfs_inode_item_size idempotent Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-21 5:14 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-28 11:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-21 0:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] xfs: split in-core and on-disk inode log item fields Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-21 5:18 ` Dave Chinner
2012-02-21 0:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] xfs: add back fdatasync support Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-21 5:23 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-03-08 20:04 ` Ben Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120221052301.GO3592@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.