From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
Cc: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@kernel.sg>,
Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:35:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120222173505.GD7147@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120222173326.GA7139@redhat.com>
signalfd_cleanup() ensures that ->signalfd_wqh is not used, but
this is not enough. eppoll_entry->whead still points to the memory
we are going to free, ep_unregister_pollwait()->remove_wait_queue()
is obviously unsafe.
Change ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) to set eppoll_entry->whead = NULL,
change ep_unregister_pollwait() to check pwq->whead != NULL before
remove_wait_queue(). We add the new ep_remove_wait_queue() helper
for this.
However this needs more locking. ep_remove_wait_queue() should take
ep->lock first to avoid the race and pin pwq->whead, then it needs
pwq->whead->lock for __remove_wait_queue().
This can obviously AB-BA deadlock with wake_up()->ep_poll_callback(),
so ep_remove_wait_queue() does the nasty lock + trylock-or-retry dance.
Of course, this also assumes that it is safe to take ep->lock in
ep_unregister_pollwait() paths, afaics this is true.
Reported-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 442bedb..ac8bd15 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -320,6 +320,11 @@ static inline int ep_is_linked(struct list_head *p)
return !list_empty(p);
}
+static inline struct eppoll_entry *ep_pwq_from_wait(wait_queue_t *p)
+{
+ return container_of(p, struct eppoll_entry, wait);
+}
+
/* Get the "struct epitem" from a wait queue pointer */
static inline struct epitem *ep_item_from_wait(wait_queue_t *p)
{
@@ -467,6 +472,33 @@ static void ep_poll_safewake(wait_queue_head_t *wq)
put_cpu();
}
+static void ep_remove_wait_queue(struct eventpoll *ep, struct eppoll_entry *pwq)
+{
+ for (;;) {
+ unsigned long flags; /* probably unneeded */
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
+ /* can be cleared by ep_poll_callback(POLLFREE) */
+ if (!pwq->whead)
+ goto unlock;
+
+ /* _trylock to avoid the deadlock, retry if it fails */
+ if (!spin_trylock(&pwq->whead->lock))
+ goto unlock;
+
+ __remove_wait_queue(pwq->whead, &pwq->wait);
+ spin_unlock(&pwq->whead->lock);
+ pwq->whead = NULL;
+ unlock:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags);
+
+ if (!pwq->whead)
+ break;
+
+ cpu_relax();
+ }
+}
+
/*
* This function unregisters poll callbacks from the associated file
* descriptor. Must be called with "mtx" held (or "epmutex" if called from
@@ -481,7 +513,7 @@ static void ep_unregister_pollwait(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
pwq = list_first_entry(lsthead, struct eppoll_entry, llink);
list_del(&pwq->llink);
- remove_wait_queue(pwq->whead, &pwq->wait);
+ ep_remove_wait_queue(ep, pwq);
kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
}
}
@@ -844,9 +876,12 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *k
spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
- /* the caller holds eppoll_entry->whead->lock */
- if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE)
- list_del_init(&wait->task_list);
+ if ((unsigned long)key & POLLFREE) {
+ struct eppoll_entry *pwq = ep_pwq_from_wait(wait);
+ /* the caller holds pwq->whead->lock */
+ __remove_wait_queue(pwq->whead, wait);
+ pwq->whead = NULL;
+ }
/*
* If the event mask does not contain any poll(2) event, we consider the
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-22 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120222173326.GA7139@redhat.com>
2012-02-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] signalfd: introduce signalfd_cleanup() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-22 17:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] epoll: introduce POLLFREE for ep_poll_callback() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-22 17:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] signalfd: signalfd_cleanup() can race with remove_wait_queue() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-22 17:35 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-02-23 15:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-23 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-24 19:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] signalfd/epoll fixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-24 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] epoll: introduce POLLFREE to flush ->signalfd_wqh before kfree() Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-29 19:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-02-29 20:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-29 20:16 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-03-01 19:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-24 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] epoll: ep_unregister_pollwait() can use the freed pwq->whead Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-24 20:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] signalfd/epoll fixes Linus Torvalds
2012-02-24 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-25 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-02-25 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120222173505.GD7147@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=eugeneteo@kernel.sg \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbizon@freebox.fr \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.