From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] ASoC: fsl: check property 'compatible' for the machine name Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:42:28 +0000 Message-ID: <20120225114227.GB3167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1329979644-31046-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-7-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120224141207.GI5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120225012845.GF24268@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1970879977490472057==" Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDDC24442 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:42:30 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20120225012845.GF24268@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Shawn Guo Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Sascha Hauer , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Timur Tabi List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --===============1970879977490472057== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MW5yreqqjyrRcusr" Content-Disposition: inline --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 09:28:47AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > Per discussion [1], the whole point we move to fsl_ssi is that we can > reuse the DT support already in fsl_ssi. If it's something we should > not use for IMX, I fail to see why we should make this move. I was assuming that the idea was to share the code for device control as the same IP block was being deployed in the various Freescale SoCs - if the only thing they have in common is the device tree support it would be a bit strange to merge them. Note that it's purely the bit where the machine driver is instantiated =66rom the SSI (which is just one or two of several properties) that I'm talking about here, the bindings for the SSI itself look good. --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPSMkcAAoJEBus8iNuMP3dPJ8P/3TY8PxjGLuIsQW93nl49yXe TeYGGAf4TN7oLVB1QtAktY28OTOSeahc6HY+z2atcik57nKnH5wOma/PsgZl03L0 mz5FVusawg16+tGd6MUekfs9FHOLvu+setSqvlyvddDLAemI1tQ15usj0nMwatAw LyDjeMd6PXmIK3rIRSHnCf4l3WZmR5LraOUzzvDFrY1IRX/zOUJYr1cim6QObJar F/O9RAWD9Gy9Mpzl5Gw4o5vDRefzijbohNHLj6zFEr4epoWMYqRyzXJqG8e35B4S dXN07dEzGzaiSPBg03E7YnXmA+UaE26hATOJNtrRhMBgyISWnNxUeoja7pbU8tYK ODfcQmTAUeoOtHDH9dMl7PNSPYdFb1Du/kbYE0xaLKmJFWWb3iAl8fV1wdwsEpuO gOwZmUEK9dm1Q0BdwneSfxndudOt7wXV2lZqeCl/OENz/1enVPnhDSkLyAcqH/1G 9l5FqOukrsBCFMSgFjjegiA65O3hauFjXEZCSfuSkuybQC7a9dge3rn6LmblHlOx 2Ev6OoeFgyTtkLOBAo1XljKLjb8v8WCeUR2W0B9ioXibwYU5nNpi/jBQM5iPgCgU yzbqynEooSR/fTip+inhACmkcJoW2wB1BfisQJE+AvCXDyXj+xnGNCE/6g+3JiFT Aboml4ZYYNLCxqhqk4Ji =sHrV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr-- --===============1970879977490472057== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============1970879977490472057==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:42:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] ASoC: fsl: check property 'compatible' for the machine name In-Reply-To: <20120225012845.GF24268@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1329979644-31046-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-7-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120224141207.GI5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120225012845.GF24268@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20120225114227.GB3167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 09:28:47AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > Per discussion [1], the whole point we move to fsl_ssi is that we can > reuse the DT support already in fsl_ssi. If it's something we should > not use for IMX, I fail to see why we should make this move. I was assuming that the idea was to share the code for device control as the same IP block was being deployed in the various Freescale SoCs - if the only thing they have in common is the device tree support it would be a bit strange to merge them. Note that it's purely the bit where the machine driver is instantiated from the SSI (which is just one or two of several properties) that I'm talking about here, the bindings for the SSI itself look good. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: