From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:44:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20120225114414.GC3167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1329979644-31046-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120224140200.GH5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120224142342.GA16659@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120224141705.GJ5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120224232148.GA24268@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <4F4819C4.5040709@freescale.com> <20120225000319.GC24268@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <4F483BB8.7030706@freescale.com> <20120225101758.GJ22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4732945596236627844==" Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C250A24450 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:44:18 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20120225101758.GJ22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , Shawn Guo , Tabi Timur-B04825 , Sascha Hauer , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --===============4732945596236627844== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E13BgyNx05feLLmH" Content-Disposition: inline --E13BgyNx05feLLmH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:17:58AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:39:05AM +0000, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > > That's not what Mark is talking about. You somehow posted patch 0/6 as= a=20 > > reply to the *previous* patchset, so the two patchsets were merged into= =20 > > one email thread. > Sorry, you and Mark are not listening to Shawn. Even worse, you're > telling Shawn that what he's trying to explain to you is not the point > when it is actually the whole point. > The "[PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl" was posted as a > follow-up to "[PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ". > So, the "*previous* patchset" _was_ "[PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let > SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ" and not some other random patch set. That > is a fundamental fact, which can't be argued. Anyone can verify it, and > it can be verified by checking the email headers. No, I get that it's a new version of the same patch set rather than a totally unrelated patch set that was followed up to - I'd still rather it weren't posted like that as the threading ends up being less helpful than is desirable. --E13BgyNx05feLLmH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPSMmIAAoJEBus8iNuMP3dXNkP/Renf2XEFlN7U2N0vlbELFEp Az0CyzyhphEy46ArDFAP62vDTu4HfJ8HWkUK3xR2/Qppb9Q4CjsZLCHhS2cpyavz iz+uyG9gWGofm03/VOMj583cjaaNdXg/r20qV4coDZg4BPn8RgHmwCe3fUih2aRF 999bpPYzW8LJWyBkZH8nO4HRXcxzAXePkiDN+KH36f/tBg/R/6Q72E8Rfrv7Fnm/ 5oM8OEsv0EL9/Mv853kpVHQB1KdNRg7n3NpnGt/Vxp1nxWQ+Qs5WxKpwuGYnuHkY i/V+th+MX3fQxQiXndC0PAY2+176AlYT5ZmuzBjR0rWi+/jQWd+orgq0VVdPfzXV dxoURW5MYqc1/liY9a+M3E6d8JmItw1NslHY18YmM4tyATa/rhQc6bMMT7LMZLCK tf6EZlV6/4jlZDU3D4sNRwMQmMLShzB+OyBQtoQ+lcWvS+oNONipz0vOQB/Ks6Aq t3Ned0SU6rDgHevzimDkAWCkWI2qku8u1mA1Tvg+GU6XzQF+QfefQkx5usNLNnm3 eDCZ/VmRrF1DdJD8iURJfENRO3L+6vSggCUWNloQLlYgeCepiqdBO8oysR2DqCLD elRhOqH7U+Rj4uEX6qr6w7p/Yg0w8GB90KlShXeSBsvGNS/FwIHtCM3VOvkS6oVx UxW43/CAVXzMSXqXI/Ij =3VuJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E13BgyNx05feLLmH-- --===============4732945596236627844== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============4732945596236627844==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:44:15 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl In-Reply-To: <20120225101758.GJ22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1329979644-31046-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1330092582-21180-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120224140200.GH5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120224142342.GA16659@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120224141705.GJ5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120224232148.GA24268@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <4F4819C4.5040709@freescale.com> <20120225000319.GC24268@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <4F483BB8.7030706@freescale.com> <20120225101758.GJ22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20120225114414.GC3167@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:17:58AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 01:39:05AM +0000, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > > That's not what Mark is talking about. You somehow posted patch 0/6 as a > > reply to the *previous* patchset, so the two patchsets were merged into > > one email thread. > Sorry, you and Mark are not listening to Shawn. Even worse, you're > telling Shawn that what he's trying to explain to you is not the point > when it is actually the whole point. > The "[PATCH 0/6] ASoC: a few cleanups on sound/soc/fsl" was posted as a > follow-up to "[PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ". > So, the "*previous* patchset" _was_ "[PATCH 1/4] ASoC: imx: let > SND_MXC_SOC_FIQ select FIQ" and not some other random patch set. That > is a fundamental fact, which can't be argued. Anyone can verify it, and > it can be verified by checking the email headers. No, I get that it's a new version of the same patch set rather than a totally unrelated patch set that was followed up to - I'd still rather it weren't posted like that as the threading ends up being less helpful than is desirable. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: