From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49791) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S23JD-0008Ex-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S23J9-0000QL-JS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:19 -0500 Received: from foo.stuge.se ([212.116.89.98]:50669) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S23J9-0000QC-7d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20120227162012.977.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:20:11 +0100 From: Peter Stuge References: <20120227095156.GA24607@redhat.com> <4F4BA055.9010005@siemens.com> <20120227160054.31694.qmail@stuge.se> <4F4BAB10.5020409@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F4BAB10.5020409@siemens.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: seabios , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Jan Kiszka wrote: > Well, the Linux kernel can also be built with practically any distro > out there. Yeah. Maybe that gets tested more than building coreboot and SeaBIOS, and so problems are discovered by those who introduce them. > Having a need for a separate toolchain for building x86 on x86 is > a bit overkill IMHO, at least for someone hacking on Seabios only > infrequently like /me. OTOH it takes about 20 minutes to build a toolchain on a reasonably fast machine, and the script makes it quite effortless. > PS: Please avoid "mail-followup-to" in your replies, it messes up To/CC. Moved this discussion to private email. //Peter