From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pedanekar, Hemant" <hemantp@ti.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: id: Add missing break statement in omap3xxx_check_revision
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:42:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120229224250.GT18901@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A8317B7282@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
* Hiremath, Vaibhav <hvaibhav@ti.com> [120129 23:59]:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:02:01, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 05:55:43, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com> [120122 23:26]:
> > > > Add missing break statement in the function omap3xxx_check_revision.
> > > >
> > > > The commit id 4390f5b2cb1f56 [ARM: OMAP: TI814X: Add cpu type macros
> > > > and detection support], removed the 'break' statement from the function
> > > > omap3xxx_check_revision(), resulting into wrong omap/cpu_revision
> > > > initialization for AM335x devices.
> > >
> > > Looks like this is already fixed, can you please verify with
> > > v3.3-rc1?
> > >
> > Tony,
> >
> > I just looked at your linux-omap/master branch and 'break' statement is missing. So this patch is still required.
> >
> > I can still see,
> >
> > 394 }
> > 395 break;
> > 396 case 0xb944:
> > 397 omap_revision = AM335X_REV_ES1_0;
> > 398 cpu_rev = "1.0";
> > 399 case 0xb8f2:
> > 400 switch (rev) {
> >
> >
> Tony,
>
> Can this be merged? I can still see "break" statement missing in the latest
> linux-omap/master branch.
OK thanks applying into fixes for the -rc cycle.
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: id: Add missing break statement in omap3xxx_check_revision
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:42:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120229224250.GT18901@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A8317B7282@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
* Hiremath, Vaibhav <hvaibhav@ti.com> [120129 23:59]:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:02:01, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 05:55:43, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com> [120122 23:26]:
> > > > Add missing break statement in the function omap3xxx_check_revision.
> > > >
> > > > The commit id 4390f5b2cb1f56 [ARM: OMAP: TI814X: Add cpu type macros
> > > > and detection support], removed the 'break' statement from the function
> > > > omap3xxx_check_revision(), resulting into wrong omap/cpu_revision
> > > > initialization for AM335x devices.
> > >
> > > Looks like this is already fixed, can you please verify with
> > > v3.3-rc1?
> > >
> > Tony,
> >
> > I just looked at your linux-omap/master branch and 'break' statement is missing. So this patch is still required.
> >
> > I can still see,
> >
> > 394 }
> > 395 break;
> > 396 case 0xb944:
> > 397 omap_revision = AM335X_REV_ES1_0;
> > 398 cpu_rev = "1.0";
> > 399 case 0xb8f2:
> > 400 switch (rev) {
> >
> >
> Tony,
>
> Can this be merged? I can still see "break" statement missing in the latest
> linux-omap/master branch.
OK thanks applying into fixes for the -rc cycle.
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-29 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 7:56 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: id: Add missing break statement in omap3xxx_check_revision Vaibhav Hiremath
2012-01-23 7:56 ` Vaibhav Hiremath
2012-01-27 0:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 0:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-01-27 5:32 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-01-27 5:32 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-01-30 8:30 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-01-30 8:30 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2012-02-29 22:42 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-02-29 22:42 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120229224250.GT18901@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=hemantp@ti.com \
--cc=hvaibhav@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.