From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Word-at-a-time dcache name accesses (was Re: .. anybody know of any filesystems that depend on the exact VFS 'namehash' implementation?)
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:02:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120303000203.GH22215@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203021544300.28247@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Stupid question. Your patch requires unaligned accesses to not have a
heavy penalty, right? Wasn't it the case that some generations of x86
had pretty large penalties for aligned accesses? Is that something we
need to worry about?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-03 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-02 23:46 Word-at-a-time dcache name accesses (was Re: .. anybody know of any filesystems that depend on the exact VFS 'namehash' implementation?) Linus Torvalds
2012-03-03 0:02 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2012-03-03 0:17 ` david
2012-03-03 0:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-04 22:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2012-03-04 23:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-03 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-03 0:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-03 0:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-03 1:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-03 1:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-03 1:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-03 16:12 ` Word-at-a-time dcache name accesses Andi Kleen
2012-03-03 18:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-03 20:10 ` Word-at-a-time dcache name accesses (was Re: .. anybody know of any filesystems that depend on the exact VFS 'namehash' implementation?) Linus Torvalds
2012-03-04 2:27 ` Word-at-a-time dcache name accesses (was Re: .. anybody know ofany " Tetsuo Handa
2012-03-04 4:31 ` Andi Kleen
2012-03-05 3:58 ` Word-at-a-time dcache name accesses (was Re: .. anybody know of any " Jason Garrett-Glaser
2012-03-05 5:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-27 4:42 ` Brian Gerst
2012-03-27 4:42 ` Brian Gerst
2012-03-27 5:02 ` Dave Jones
2012-03-27 5:31 ` Brian Gerst
2012-03-28 0:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-28 0:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-28 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-28 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-28 0:56 ` Brian Gerst
[not found] ` <CACvQF53YasSCUit2KoWDimgObknCz++aU90MesSfvAZTeUFQHw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-04 16:50 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120303000203.GH22215@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.