Re: proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti?

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 12:45:01PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-03-04 12:27, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 01:14:17PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >>>On 2012-03-04 05:19, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>    not sure if you're suggesting i should now be able to build
> >>>>for, say, beagleboard with the meta-ti layer, but i cloned meta-ti
> >>>>into my yocto tree, added that layer to bblayers.conf, and tried
> >>>>to
> >>>>
> >>>>$ bitbake core-image-minimal
> >>>>
> >>>>and got what i believe gary was referring to above:
> >>>>
> >>>>$ bitbake core-image-minimal
> >>>>Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the main
> >>>>build
> >>>>ERROR: ParseError at
> >>>>/home/rpjday/yocto/git/meta-ti/recipes-misc/payload/bonescript.bb:5:
> >>>>Could not inherit file classes/systemd.bbclass
> >>>>ERROR: Command execution failed: Exited with 1
> >>>>
> >>>>    or am i misreading what you wrote?
> >>>
> >>>Oops, that's one more workaround I forgot to mention.  This file
> >>>is in OE-core, but not in poky.  I made a local copy in my distro
> >>>layer, but there must be a better way to handle it.
> >>
> >>   um ... AFAICT, that .bbclass file is in meta-oe, not oe-core.  and
> >>since i have meta-openembedded checked out, i simply copied the whole
> >>thing into my yocto tree, then tweaked my bblayers.conf file to look
> >>like:
> >>
> >>BBLAYERS ?= " \
> >>   /home/rpjday/yocto/git/meta \
> >>   /home/rpjday/yocto/git/meta-yocto \
> >>   /home/rpjday/yocto/git/meta-ti \
> >>   /home/rpjday/yocto/git/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \
> >>   "
> >
> >Either way, meta-oe is still required for meta-ti due to toolchain issues...
> 
> Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions in
> oe-core don't work for meta-ti?

One of the issues:

https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-February/000491.html

I haven't tried if either 3.0 or a pending 3.1 update for Panda (from 
omapzoom/ti-ubuntu), resolve this gcc-4.6 build issue. But either way I 
believe there was something else with one of our components not building with 
gcc-4.6 - SGX or multimedia, don't remember exactly.

-- 
Denys