From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9D4E013BA for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.178.225.66]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M0E009IO9OAN011@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for yocto@yoctoproject.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:26:34 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4196B20168; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:26:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:26:34 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Robert P. J. Day" Message-id: <20120305042634.GC14417@denix.org> References: <4F514EC8.8000606@ti.com> <4F515551.50708@mlbassoc.com> <20120304061843.GN24667@denix.org> <4F5361B6.8040908@mlbassoc.com> <20120304192728.GO24667@denix.org> <4F53C63D.1000305@mlbassoc.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Yocto discussion list Subject: Re: proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 04:27:24 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:38:36PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Gary Thomas wrote: > > > Can you explain what the toolchain problems are and why the versions > > in oe-core don't work for meta-ti? > > i just finished doing a "bitbake core-image-minimal" for a > beagleboard using the meta-ti layer, and having only to set a > preferred version for udev. > > the build finished (albeit with a few warnings), and i have all of > the images i would expect for a beagle xM. should i consider this a > form of success -- the simple fact that the build appeared to succeed? Did you have meta-oe in your layer stack? -- Denys