From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net (vms173017pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.17]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6FEE013BA for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:12:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.178.225.66]) by vms173017.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M0E002EUBS8V1U0@vms173017.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 23:12:09 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2F5A620370; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:12:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:12:08 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: "Robert P. J. Day" Message-id: <20120305051208.GD14417@denix.org> References: <4F514EC8.8000606@ti.com> <4F515551.50708@mlbassoc.com> <20120304061843.GN24667@denix.org> <4F5361B6.8040908@mlbassoc.com> <20120304192728.GO24667@denix.org> <4F53C63D.1000305@mlbassoc.com> <20120304200405.GP24667@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] proper recipe for building for beagle xM? meta-ti? X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 05:12:19 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 04:18:54PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > > One of the issues: > > > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-February/000491.html > > > > I haven't tried if either 3.0 or a pending 3.1 update for Panda > > (from omapzoom/ti-ubuntu), resolve this gcc-4.6 build issue. But > > either way I believe there was something else with one of our > > components not building with gcc-4.6 - SGX or multimedia, don't > > remember exactly. > > taking koen's advice to heart, should this discussion be happening > on the meta-ti list? Sure, let's switch to meta-ti... Here's another report of gcc-4.6 failing on u-boot, due to wrong optimization used, which should be easy to fix, though: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-February/000614.html -- Denys