All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>,
	Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@gazzang.com>,
	ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linus GIT (3.3.0-rc6+) -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:23:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120305132334.e3fc92cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHFgRy-V3ZFK6QrC2++Rvyi4e_f-03Xdr9sj4PUJORVq21GiEw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 16:08:55 -0500
Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> wrote:

> [  107.839605] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [  107.839608] 3.3.0-rc6+ #14 Not tainted
> [  107.839609] -------------------------------------------------------
> [  107.839611] gvfsd-metadata/2314 is trying to acquire lock:
> [  107.839612]  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}, at:
> [<ffffffff810ae65a>] generic_file_aio_write+0x45/0xbc
> [  107.839622]
> [  107.839623] but task is already holding lock:
> [  107.839624]  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff810ca534>]
> sys_munmap+0x36/0x5b
> [  107.839630]
> [  107.839630] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> [  107.839631]
> [  107.839632]
> [  107.839632] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> [  107.839634]
> [  107.839634] -> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
> [  107.839638]        [<ffffffff8107402d>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
> [  107.839642]        [<ffffffff810c3363>] might_fault+0x7b/0x9e
> [  107.839646]        [<ffffffff810f5246>] filldir+0x6a/0xc2
> [  107.839649]        [<ffffffff81143b91>] call_filldir+0x91/0xb8
> [  107.839653]        [<ffffffff81143eb2>] ext4_readdir+0x1b2/0x519
> [  107.839656]        [<ffffffff810f548c>] vfs_readdir+0x76/0xac
> [  107.839658]        [<ffffffff810f559e>] sys_getdents+0x79/0xc9
> [  107.839661]        [<ffffffff813a1fb9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [  107.839665]
> [  107.839665] -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13){+.+.+.}:
> [  107.839669]        [<ffffffff81073918>] __lock_acquire+0xa81/0xd75
> [  107.839672]        [<ffffffff8107402d>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
> [  107.839675]        [<ffffffff8139acfe>] __mutex_lock_common+0x61/0x456
> [  107.839679]        [<ffffffff8139b1da>] mutex_lock_nested+0x36/0x3b
> [  107.839681]        [<ffffffff810ae65a>] generic_file_aio_write+0x45/0xbc
> [  107.839684]        [<ffffffff8114478e>] ext4_file_write+0x1e2/0x23a
> [  107.839687]        [<ffffffff810e5bb5>] do_sync_write+0xbd/0xfd
> [  107.839691]        [<ffffffff810e6333>] vfs_write+0xa7/0xee
> [  107.839694]        [<ffffffffa037f266>]
> ecryptfs_write_lower+0x4e/0x73 [ecryptfs]
> [  107.839700]        [<ffffffffa03803d3>]
> ecryptfs_encrypt_page+0x11c/0x182 [ecryptfs]
> [  107.839704]        [<ffffffffa037e967>]
> ecryptfs_writepage+0x31/0x73 [ecryptfs]
> [  107.839708]        [<ffffffff810b448b>] __writepage+0x12/0x31
> [  107.839710]        [<ffffffff810b4b25>] write_cache_pages+0x1e6/0x310
> [  107.839713]        [<ffffffff810b4c8d>] generic_writepages+0x3e/0x54
> [  107.839716]        [<ffffffff810b5e05>] do_writepages+0x26/0x28
> [  107.839719]        [<ffffffff810ae1e4>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x4e/0x50
> [  107.839722]        [<ffffffff810aed55>] filemap_fdatawrite+0x1a/0x1c
> [  107.839725]        [<ffffffff810aed72>] filemap_write_and_wait+0x1b/0x36
> [  107.839727]        [<ffffffffa037c1bb>]
> ecryptfs_vma_close+0x17/0x19 [ecryptfs]
> [  107.839731]        [<ffffffff810c9374>] remove_vma+0x3b/0x71
> [  107.839733]        [<ffffffff810ca40c>] do_munmap+0x2ed/0x306
> [  107.839735]        [<ffffffff810ca542>] sys_munmap+0x44/0x5b
> [  107.839738]        [<ffffffff813a1fb9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [  107.839741]
> [  107.839741] other info that might help us debug this:
> [  107.839741]
> [  107.839743]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> [  107.839743]
> [  107.839744]        CPU0                    CPU1
> [  107.839746]        ----                    ----
> [  107.839747]   lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
> [  107.839749]                                lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13);
> [  107.839753]                                lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
> [  107.839755]   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#13);
> [  107.839758]
> [  107.839758]  *** DEADLOCK ***
> [  107.839759]
> [  107.839761] 1 lock held by gvfsd-metadata/2314:
> [  107.839762]  #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff810ca534>]
> sys_munmap+0x36/0x5b
> [  107.839767]
> [  107.839767] stack backtrace:
> [  107.839769] Pid: 2314, comm: gvfsd-metadata Not tainted 3.3.0-rc6+ #14
> [  107.839771] Call Trace:
> [  107.839775]  [<ffffffff813956a2>] print_circular_bug+0x1f8/0x209
> [  107.839778]  [<ffffffff81073918>] __lock_acquire+0xa81/0xd75
> [  107.839781]  [<ffffffff81073bfd>] ? __lock_acquire+0xd66/0xd75
> [  107.839784]  [<ffffffff8107402d>] lock_acquire+0x8a/0xa7
> [  107.839787]  [<ffffffff810ae65a>] ? generic_file_aio_write+0x45/0xbc
> [  107.839790]  [<ffffffff8139acfe>] __mutex_lock_common+0x61/0x456
> [  107.839792]  [<ffffffff810ae65a>] ? generic_file_aio_write+0x45/0xbc
> [  107.839795]  [<ffffffff81071a96>] ? mark_lock+0x2d/0x258
> [  107.839798]  [<ffffffff810ae65a>] ? generic_file_aio_write+0x45/0xbc
> [  107.839801]  [<ffffffff8107299e>] ? lock_is_held+0x92/0x9d
> [  107.839803]  [<ffffffff8139b1da>] mutex_lock_nested+0x36/0x3b
> [  107.839806]  [<ffffffff810ae65a>] generic_file_aio_write+0x45/0xbc
> [  107.839810]  [<ffffffff811a013f>] ? scatterwalk_map+0x2b/0x5d
> [  107.839813]  [<ffffffff810570d4>] ? get_parent_ip+0xe/0x3e
> [  107.839816]  [<ffffffff8114478e>] ext4_file_write+0x1e2/0x23a
> [  107.839818]  [<ffffffff81071a96>] ? mark_lock+0x2d/0x258
> [  107.839821]  [<ffffffff810e5bb5>] do_sync_write+0xbd/0xfd
> [  107.839824]  [<ffffffff8139b2fd>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x11e/0x152
> [  107.839828]  [<ffffffff81197092>] ? security_file_permission+0x29/0x2e
> [  107.839831]  [<ffffffff810e60b2>] ? rw_verify_area+0xab/0xc8
> [  107.839834]  [<ffffffff810e6333>] vfs_write+0xa7/0xee
> [  107.839838]  [<ffffffffa037f266>] ecryptfs_write_lower+0x4e/0x73 [ecryptfs]
> [  107.839842]  [<ffffffffa03803d3>] ecryptfs_encrypt_page+0x11c/0x182
> [ecryptfs]
> [  107.839846]  [<ffffffffa037e967>] ecryptfs_writepage+0x31/0x73 [ecryptfs]
> [  107.839849]  [<ffffffff810b448b>] __writepage+0x12/0x31
> [  107.839851]  [<ffffffff810b4b25>] write_cache_pages+0x1e6/0x310
> [  107.839854]  [<ffffffff810b4479>] ? bdi_set_max_ratio+0x6a/0x6a
> [  107.839857]  [<ffffffff813a03c1>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x90/0xa3
> [  107.839860]  [<ffffffff810b4c8d>] generic_writepages+0x3e/0x54
> [  107.839863]  [<ffffffff810b5e05>] do_writepages+0x26/0x28
> [  107.839866]  [<ffffffff810ae1e4>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x4e/0x50
> [  107.839869]  [<ffffffff810aed55>] filemap_fdatawrite+0x1a/0x1c
> [  107.839871]  [<ffffffff810aed72>] filemap_write_and_wait+0x1b/0x36
> [  107.839875]  [<ffffffffa037c1bb>] ecryptfs_vma_close+0x17/0x19 [ecryptfs]
> [  107.839877]  [<ffffffff810c9374>] remove_vma+0x3b/0x71
> [  107.839879]  [<ffffffff810ca40c>] do_munmap+0x2ed/0x306
> [  107.839882]  [<ffffffff810ca542>] sys_munmap+0x44/0x5b
> [  107.839884]  [<ffffffff813a1fb9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

mmap_sem nests inside i_mutex.

On the path

	munmap
	->ecryptfs_vma_close
	  ->filemap_write_and_wait
	    ->generic_file_aio_write

we're taking i_mutex inside mmap_sem.  So the problem is triggered by
ecryptfs_vma_close() calling filemap_write_and_wait() inside munmap()'s
mmap_sem.

Question is: what did we recently change to cause this to happen?

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-05 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-05 21:08 Linus GIT (3.3.0-rc6+) -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected Miles Lane
2012-03-05 21:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-03-05 21:35   ` Al Viro
2012-03-05 21:46     ` Tyler Hicks
2012-03-05 21:33 ` Al Viro
2012-03-05 21:46 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-05 22:02   ` Ted Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120305132334.e3fc92cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=dustin.kirkland@gazzang.com \
    --cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    --cc=tyhicks@canonical.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.