From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v8 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:27:39 -0800 Message-ID: <20120305162739.GP22536@google.com> References: <1328067470-5980-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20120201163126.GA19837@google.com> <20120201184959.GH6731@somewhere.redhat.com> <20120201115107.93e11471.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120202145000.GC9071@somewhere.redhat.com> <4F4FFDE4.8050908@free.fr> <20120305032130.GD18143@somewhere.redhat.com> <20120305162652.GO22536@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=tjvsMDac6CTFCgtXaQ8b+d7KLHLLlS0RHf2wAe01hRg=; b=liWK/GKlK8XbXTXjmNJ1YL17PR17MucJgQ0uqXyHzBe7BYznhclRRZS56jPDseHEeq sw3zfB2umIlSsojYkVyUzDFsDOBJCkiMgVVJHMj0GXfKiM+S19dfc3hWoJoY4xJyD1V+ Fj5KwTfMhrMRKxCTOxobukfvD7FYyglRzp5ITX9yU1yz9GEAOzv4pxRdLCoz2dzozwfn puuKeG3gUJKcaYfnAKht1W127dyy6e4O07nGqy9rzp29u1417pTl9zGOqcq2FmvfM+o6 JoJhoefTlJH9CLzbeouDQb9G7WeVa2B03rdIlHQp3Uige1pRrcUwBWBCNzRYUk4b6vWQ LlOg== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120305162652.GO22536-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Andrew Morton , Li Zefan , Aditya Kali , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Max Kellermann , Tim Hockin , Glauber Costa , Paul Menage , Daniel J Walsh , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Mandeep Singh Baines , Cgroups , Johannes Weiner , Containers , Papp =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tam=E1s?= , Ulli Horlacher On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:26:52AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Frederic. > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:21:33AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Time for me to try to wake up again this discussion. > > Andrew, Tejun, Li, as you can see we don't lack the users > > for this feature. > > Yes, I agree this can be a useful feature for certain use cases. I'm > just mostly feeling reluctant about adding another utility type > controller without clear direction on how to proceed from here on > regarding multiple hierarchies (and I was on vacation :). That said, > dealing with multiple hierarchies is a much longer term issue and > we'll probably have to continue on our current path for the time > being. > > We're already into -rc6, so unless someone objects I'll try to merge > it after the coming merge window. If I don't take action after the coming -rc1, please ping me. Thanks. -- tejun From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755944Ab2CEQ1p (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:27:45 -0500 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:42834 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753534Ab2CEQ1o (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:27:44 -0500 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of htejun@gmail.com designates 10.68.130.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=htejun@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=htejun@gmail.com Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:27:39 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Andrew Morton , Li Zefan , Aditya Kali , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Max Kellermann , Tim Hockin , Glauber Costa , Paul Menage , Daniel J Walsh , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Mandeep Singh Baines , Cgroups , Johannes Weiner , Containers , Papp =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tam=E1s?= , Ulli Horlacher Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v8 Message-ID: <20120305162739.GP22536@google.com> References: <1328067470-5980-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20120201163126.GA19837@google.com> <20120201184959.GH6731@somewhere.redhat.com> <20120201115107.93e11471.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120202145000.GC9071@somewhere.redhat.com> <4F4FFDE4.8050908@free.fr> <20120305032130.GD18143@somewhere.redhat.com> <20120305162652.GO22536@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120305162652.GO22536@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:26:52AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Frederic. > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:21:33AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Time for me to try to wake up again this discussion. > > Andrew, Tejun, Li, as you can see we don't lack the users > > for this feature. > > Yes, I agree this can be a useful feature for certain use cases. I'm > just mostly feeling reluctant about adding another utility type > controller without clear direction on how to proceed from here on > regarding multiple hierarchies (and I was on vacation :). That said, > dealing with multiple hierarchies is a much longer term issue and > we'll probably have to continue on our current path for the time > being. > > We're already into -rc6, so unless someone objects I'll try to merge > it after the coming merge window. If I don't take action after the coming -rc1, please ping me. Thanks. -- tejun