From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v8 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 17:48:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20120305164831.GA20996@somewhere.redhat.com> References: <1328067470-5980-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20120201163126.GA19837@google.com> <20120201184959.GH6731@somewhere.redhat.com> <20120201115107.93e11471.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120202145000.GC9071@somewhere.redhat.com> <4F4FFDE4.8050908@free.fr> <20120305032130.GD18143@somewhere.redhat.com> <20120305162652.GO22536@google.com> <20120305162739.GP22536@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vKhtFOFtVYCqVRjgO/mm9VnoOtuaYolIh3rZr5mNxrc=; b=TxSWJsNJiii90DYqT9NqVrpkOZDhycUzvUdZMCc39aEQjXMMsjm30uZLtw0GWpL1RV yxOtEdL0z//MROO29CcnvkJjj4sGW6+5gDcyUn8oX5YWqf0Q/zVsKETWUBsgRekXsZux xAn7URvRKYsdZpetNYcocyKqfp8KlIzC4hImwUEwmcopVc/lYWaK2wMEpbv/P9l9TWBT DfK8EZ0tMqc+c/LnBMljDPBcDzRKXZCGlzv+6xKRHG2tdGIUOfmtEOiTA8+/ZHXNjsB2 VJnbAIsnWgTbY02OV4/gTQYX8JCFtuNWEbMsK3d5D4Lrt+9hLbbEeoN56J8pMr9Hwx2u UgXA== Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120305162739.GP22536-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tejun Heo Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Andrew Morton , Li Zefan , Aditya Kali , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Max Kellermann , Tim Hockin , Glauber Costa , Paul Menage , Daniel J Walsh , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Mandeep Singh Baines , Cgroups , Johannes Weiner , Containers , Papp =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tam=E1s?= , Ulli Horlacher On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:26:52AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Frederic. > > > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:21:33AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Time for me to try to wake up again this discussion. > > > Andrew, Tejun, Li, as you can see we don't lack the users > > > for this feature. > > > > Yes, I agree this can be a useful feature for certain use cases. I'm > > just mostly feeling reluctant about adding another utility type > > controller without clear direction on how to proceed from here on > > regarding multiple hierarchies (and I was on vacation :). That said, > > dealing with multiple hierarchies is a much longer term issue and > > we'll probably have to continue on our current path for the time > > being. > > > > We're already into -rc6, so unless someone objects I'll try to merge > > it after the coming merge window. Thanks a lot! > > If I don't take action after the coming -rc1, please ping me. Thanks. Sure I will :) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756387Ab2CEQsm (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:48:42 -0500 Received: from mail-vx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:62097 "EHLO mail-vx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755681Ab2CEQsl (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:48:41 -0500 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of fweisbec@gmail.com designates 10.52.99.194 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=fweisbec@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=fweisbec@gmail.com Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 17:48:33 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Tejun Heo Cc: Daniel Lezcano , Andrew Morton , Li Zefan , Aditya Kali , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Max Kellermann , Tim Hockin , Glauber Costa , Paul Menage , Daniel J Walsh , LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Mandeep Singh Baines , Cgroups , Johannes Weiner , Containers , Papp =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tam=E1s?= , Ulli Horlacher Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v8 Message-ID: <20120305164831.GA20996@somewhere.redhat.com> References: <1328067470-5980-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20120201163126.GA19837@google.com> <20120201184959.GH6731@somewhere.redhat.com> <20120201115107.93e11471.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120202145000.GC9071@somewhere.redhat.com> <4F4FFDE4.8050908@free.fr> <20120305032130.GD18143@somewhere.redhat.com> <20120305162652.GO22536@google.com> <20120305162739.GP22536@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120305162739.GP22536@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:27:39AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:26:52AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, Frederic. > > > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:21:33AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > Time for me to try to wake up again this discussion. > > > Andrew, Tejun, Li, as you can see we don't lack the users > > > for this feature. > > > > Yes, I agree this can be a useful feature for certain use cases. I'm > > just mostly feeling reluctant about adding another utility type > > controller without clear direction on how to proceed from here on > > regarding multiple hierarchies (and I was on vacation :). That said, > > dealing with multiple hierarchies is a much longer term issue and > > we'll probably have to continue on our current path for the time > > being. > > > > We're already into -rc6, so unless someone objects I'll try to merge > > it after the coming merge window. Thanks a lot! > > If I don't take action after the coming -rc1, please ping me. Thanks. Sure I will :)