From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE801E01373 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:58:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.178.225.66]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M0F007FZ8HYTJJ1@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for meta-ti@yoctoproject.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 10:58:47 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E587220466; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:58:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:58:44 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Gary Thomas Message-id: <20120305165844.GE14417@denix.org> References: <3A03FCB1-56B0-42C4-9260-24B10EF4531E@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F4BB801.3090108@ti.com> <329D2F11-A3FF-4029-8F3D-EC6A7587D138@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F54ED21.9000208@mlbassoc.com> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <4F54ED21.9000208@mlbassoc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Building Yocto for Pandaboard X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:58:48 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:43:13AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-03-05 09:39, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Christian.Schulenberg@bmw.de wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>I'm using a Pandaboard Rev A4, so it is in fact an OMAP4430 board. > >> > >>You can change to u-boot bootloader in /meta-ti/conf/machine/omap4430-panda.conf: > > > > i noticed that koen just submitted a sizable patch that gets rid of > >that conf file for the panda, and standardizes on the pandaboard.conf > >file (at least that's what it looked like). > > > > under the circumstances, it might be worth just waiting until that > >patch works its way through the system and start testing all over > >again when it hits. > > Yes, you'll also get a newer kernel (3.0.2 last I looked, not 2.6.35) FYI, there is already 3.1 for Panda in meta-ti with -1 D_P... -- Denys