All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: OMAP totally fucked?
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:07:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120305190759.GJ12083@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120304155909.GA14466@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [120304 07:27]:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 01:05:21PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [120303 09:57]:
> > > On Saturday 03 March 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > Well 85631d2 builds fine, looks like now some more includes of
> > > > plat/hardware.h are now needed.Have not yet tracked down which
> > > > commit triggers the build errors. Eventually those should become
> > > > local headers too..
> > > 
> > > I've tried building arm-soc/for-next and rmk/for-next, they are both
> > > fine, just merging the two gives me the same build errors that Russell
> > > saw.
> > > 
> > > Adding plat/hardware.h in all files that break solves the problems,
> > > aside from the iommu dependency for rpmsg for which Ohad has provided
> > > a fix already that I should pull.
> > 
> > Here's a patch for you to the cleanup branch to fix the hardware.h
> > build errors.
> 
> Right, with this applied, things are better:
> 
> 1. omap3430ldp allnoconfig is the first build without warnings, congrats.
> 2. omap4430sdp allnoconfig has a bunch of new section mismatch warnings,
>    a couple of compiler warnings, and builds:
> 
> WARNING: arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o(.text+0x183c): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap2_init_processor_devices() to the function .init.text:_init_omap_device()
> The function omap2_init_processor_devices() references
> the function __init _init_omap_device().
> This is often because omap2_init_processor_devices lacks a __init 
> annotation or the annotation of _init_omap_device is wrong.
> 
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:51: warning: 'omap24xx_io_desc' defined but not used
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c:181: warning: 'wakeupgen_irqmask_all' defined but not used
> 
> 3. omap4430sdp randconfig built with these omap specific warnings (exluding
>    ones already mentioned):
> 
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:39: warning: 'slot1_cover_open' defined but not used
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:40: warning: 'slot2_cover_open' defined but not used
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:41: warning: 'mmc_device' defined but not used

I'll do some patches to fix these warnings.
 
> and, of course, this is with these configs building OMAP2..OMAP4 because of
> the config.

That should get fixed soon too with revert.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-05 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-03 15:46 OMAP totally fucked? Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-03 18:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 18:29   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-03 21:05     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-04 15:59       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-05 19:07         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-03-06 19:45         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-06 19:55           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-06 20:15         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-06 21:23           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 18:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-03 19:01     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 19:28       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-03 20:01         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 20:28           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 20:34             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 20:52               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-03 21:21                 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 21:57                   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-06 14:58                   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-06 15:08                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-06 15:41                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-06 15:29   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-03-06 20:14     ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120305190759.GJ12083@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.