From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-RT] preempt.h: Fix implicit declaration of 'preempt_check_resched_rt'
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:22:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120308142257.145e0968@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331237840.25686.470.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 979 bytes --]
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:17:20 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 21:13 +0100, John Kacur wrote:
> > When building a non-preempt kernel where CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is not
> > defined the following build break occurs.
> >
> > /home/jkacur/linux-rt/block/blk-softirq.c: In function ‘trigger_softirq’:
> > /home/jkacur/linux-rt/block/blk-softirq.c:54: error: implicit declaration of function ‘preempt_check_resched_rt’
> > make[2]: *** [block/blk-softirq.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [block/blk-softirq.o] Error 2
> > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> >
> > This patch fixes the build error by adding a define to the
> > !CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT section.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
>
> Why Clark's SOB? Did he write it and send it to you?
I suppose to be technically correct it should have been a Tested-by:
John found it while I was working on it and I tested it for him.
Clark
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-08 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-08 20:13 [PATCH-RT] preempt.h: Fix implicit declaration of 'preempt_check_resched_rt' John Kacur
2012-03-08 20:13 ` John Kacur
2012-03-08 20:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-08 20:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-08 20:22 ` Clark Williams [this message]
2012-03-08 20:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-08 20:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-08 21:04 ` John Kacur
2012-03-08 21:04 ` John Kacur
2012-03-13 19:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-13 19:24 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120308142257.145e0968@redhat.com \
--to=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.