From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC]: xenpaging: add command to to flush qemu buffer cache via VMCALL Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:42:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20120308144216.GA19728@aepfle.de> References: <20120308142936.GK64337@ocelot.phlegethon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120308142936.GK64337@ocelot.phlegethon.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tim Deegan Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Mar 08, Tim Deegan wrote: > At 17:15 +0100 on 26 Feb (1330276512), Olaf Hering wrote: > > # HG changeset patch > > # User Olaf Hering > > # Date 1330272880 -3600 > > # Node ID e17afed13a35989bdf422b75d44843bfd2fda0f4 > > # Parent 3ace34b89ebe3bdd6afb0bca85b0c1270f99c1bb > > [RFC]: xenpaging: add command to to flush qemu buffer cache via VMCALL > > > > Is the approach taken in this patch ok? > > Can you explain a bit more about what you're trying to do? It looked easy to "inject" a request to send a flush to ioemu in this way. But it turned out that this approach will not work. So both old and new qemu need a change to accept the flush command in some way. For old qemu the xenstore approach looks best, for the new qemu I need to dig into QMP. Olaf