From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: The list for a Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking
<b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org>
Cc: Battle of the Mesh Mailing List <battlemesh@ml.ninux.org>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Diversity in BATMAN
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 17:57:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120309165729.GG16608@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120309163846.GM15059@kerneis.info>
> > So when comparing a 1Mbps and a 54Mbps link, probably the TQ for the
> > 54Mbps link will be better than the 1Mbps link.
>
> That was our intuition too, but experiments we did in Brussels using 802.11n
> multiradio routers, with Benjamin and Juliusz, seemed to show that packet loss
> (as measured by babel at least) is not always correlated to throughput. I do
> not claim to understand how this is possible.
How do you define throughput? Do you mean the coding rate the wifi
driver has chosen to use, or iperf/netperf measurements of throughput?
Also, does babel perform its measurements using unicast or
broadcast/multicast packets/frames?
> It was in a limited setup, however, and we would be glad to get more results
> proving or disproving this hypothesis. Do you have any actual experimental
> results to share on this topic?
I've got no results on 11n. I've done most of my work on 11g. I will
see if i've got any results for 11g which might be appropriate.
Maybe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-09 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4F4F6D18.3070403@ninux.org>
[not found] ` <201203070156.51341.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
[not found] ` <20120306193643.GM12778@kerneis.info>
[not found] ` <201203070552.33850.lindner_marek@yahoo.de>
[not found] ` <7i62egijym.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
[not found] ` <20120307144709.GA19891@ritirata.org>
[not found] ` <7ieht4mnnp.fsf@lanthane.pps.jussieu.fr>
[not found] ` <20120307171751.GC1389@ritirata.org>
2012-03-07 22:18 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 8:56 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-03-09 9:17 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 9:42 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 9:56 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 10:02 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 10:26 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 10:36 ` Roger Baig Viñas
2012-03-09 10:55 ` Mitar
2012-03-09 10:59 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 11:39 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Diversity in BATMAN [was: Battlemesh v5 tests] Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 12:44 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] " andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 13:10 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Diversity in BATMAN Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 13:25 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 13:36 ` andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 14:07 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 14:36 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 15:25 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 15:40 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 15:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 16:07 ` Benjamin Henrion
2012-03-09 16:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 16:38 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 16:57 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2012-03-09 18:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-11 1:22 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 1:37 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 8:53 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-11 15:53 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 16:02 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 20:39 ` Simon Wunderlich
2012-03-13 3:37 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 1:21 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-09 11:12 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 11:26 ` Marek Lindner
2012-03-09 12:04 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 12:39 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 12:57 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 13:03 ` Antonio Quartulli
2012-03-09 13:09 ` andrew.lunn
2012-03-09 13:46 ` Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 14:26 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-10 16:20 ` Mitar
2012-03-11 8:45 ` Henning Rogge
2012-03-11 15:32 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Network models [was: Battlemesh v5 tests] Juliusz Chroboczek
2012-03-11 16:15 ` Mitar
2012-03-09 13:49 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [Battlemesh] Battlemesh v5 tests Gabriel Kerneis
2012-03-09 14:15 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120309165729.GG16608@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
--cc=battlemesh@ml.ninux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.