From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Allison Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] CIFS: Respect MaxMpxCount field Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:14:39 -0800 Message-ID: <20120309201439.GH9348@samba2> References: <1329895984-9251-1-git-send-email-piastry@etersoft.ru> <1329895984-9251-7-git-send-email-piastry@etersoft.ru> <20120303070921.5ce2bb10@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20120309073930.3a79fa10@redhat.com> <4F5A543D.2040808@samba.org> Reply-To: Jeremy Allison Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Steve French , Jeff Layton , Pavel Shilovsky , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, jra-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org To: "Christopher R. Hertel" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F5A543D.2040808-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:04:29PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > > The folks at Microsoft (who are, of course, well ahead in their > SMB2.x implementations) are very surprised that we are trying to > maintain a single codebase for both protocols. (I heard the same > thing from several Microsoft engineers during separate > conversations.) That's just a misunderstanding of how our codebase is structured, that's all. The SMB1 parser/protocol engine is completely different code from the SMB2 parser/protocol engine in Samba. What is in common (as is also in common in Microsoft's codebase) is the code that implements the underlying file system functionality. They have a common NTFS (and now ReFS) codebase, we have a common map POSIX to Windows semantics layer. Jeremy.