From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux MMC list <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / QoS: Make it possible to expose PM QoS latency constraints
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 21:59:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203092159.40409.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pqcl4s4d.fsf@ti.com>
On Friday, March 09, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > How about calling it "runtime latency"? Or "runtime wakeup latency" in
> > case people think there might be some other sort of latency associated
> > with runtime power management.
>
> Either is better than just latency, but I would vote for runtime wakeup
> latency.
Well, that would be pm_qos_runtime_wakeup_latency_us. Kind of long, IMHO.
Apart from this "wakeup" may be thought to refer to "remote wakeup", which
is when a device is resumed as a result of an external signal.
pm_qos_resume_latency_us is shorter and since it is referred to in the
documentation as "resume latency", I don't see any problems with that name.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-09 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-04 0:01 [PATCH 0/3] MMC / PM: Make it possible to use PM QoS latency constraints Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-04 0:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-04 10:59 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-04 19:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-04 0:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] tmio_mmc / PM: Use PM QoS requests Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-04 0:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] sh_mmcif " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-04 19:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] MMC / PM: Make it possible to use PM QoS latency constraints Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-04 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] MMC / PM: Make it possible to use PM QoS latency constraints, v2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-05 7:02 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-06 9:34 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-06 21:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-04 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] tmio_mmc / PM: Use PM QoS requests, v2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-06 9:40 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-06 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-06 22:33 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-06 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-04 19:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] sh_mmcif " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-06 9:40 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-06 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-07 23:27 ` [PATCH 0/3] PM: Make it possible to expose PM QoS latency constraints Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-07 23:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] PM / QoS: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 17:49 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-08 18:01 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-08 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 21:23 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-08 21:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 22:05 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-08 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 23:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-08 23:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-09 1:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-09 15:17 ` Alan Stern
2012-03-09 17:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-09 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-03-09 21:34 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-07 23:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] tmio_mmc / PM: Use PM QoS latency constraint Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 8:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-03-08 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-07 23:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] sh_mmcif " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 11:03 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-08 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 23:00 ` [Update][PATCH 0/3] PM: Make it possible to expose PM QoS latency constraints Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 23:01 ` [Update][PATCH 1/3] PM / QoS: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-12 19:32 ` Linus Walleij
2012-03-13 0:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 23:03 ` [Update][PATCH 2/3] tmio_mmc / PM: Use PM QoS latency constraint Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-08 23:03 ` [Update][PATCH 3/3] sh_mmcif " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-10 21:14 ` [Update][PATCH 0/3] PM: Make it possible to expose PM QoS latency constraints Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-06 10:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] MMC / PM: Make it possible to use " Adrian Hunter
2012-03-06 13:39 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-03-06 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-07 8:31 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-03-07 9:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-07 19:38 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-07 20:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-07 20:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-07 20:54 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-07 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-06 21:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-07 7:06 ` Adrian Hunter
2012-03-07 9:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201203092159.40409.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.