From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 18:26:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120311182621.41674b39@de.ibm.com> (raw)
Git commit 09a1d34f8535ecf9 "nohz: Make idle/iowait counter update conditional"
introduced a bug in regard to cpu hotplug. The effect is that the number
of idle ticks in the cpu summary line in /proc/stat is still counting
ticks for offline cpus.
Reproduction is easy, just start a workload that keeps all cpus busy,
switch off one or more cpus and then watch the idle field in top.
On a dual-core with one cpu 100% busy and one offline cpu you will get
something like this:
%Cpu(s): 48.7 us, 1.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 50.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
The problem is that an offline cpu still has ts->idle_active == 1.
To fix this get_cpu_idle_time_us and get_cpu_iowait_time_us
should check for offline cpus.
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ u64 get_cpu_idle_time_us(int cpu, u64 *l
struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
ktime_t now, idle;
- if (!tick_nohz_enabled)
+ if (!tick_nohz_enabled || !cpu_online(cpu))
return -1;
now = ktime_get();
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ u64 get_cpu_iowait_time_us(int cpu, u64
struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
ktime_t now, iowait;
- if (!tick_nohz_enabled)
+ if (!tick_nohz_enabled || !cpu_online(cpu))
return -1;
now = ktime_get();
next reply other threads:[~2012-03-11 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-11 22:26 Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2012-03-12 12:17 ` [PATCH] fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat Michal Hocko
2012-03-12 14:17 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-03-12 14:48 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-12 15:39 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-12 20:41 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-03-13 8:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Hocko
2012-03-13 8:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-07-18 11:52 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-07-18 12:21 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-29 10:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-30 10:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-03-30 10:41 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-30 11:01 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-30 13:58 ` [tip:timers/core] proc: stats: Use arch_idle_time for idle and iowait times if available tip-bot for Martin Schwidefsky
2012-03-30 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-02 6:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120311182621.41674b39@de.ibm.com \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.