From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: kirkwood: Basic support for DNS-320 and DNS-325 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:43:25 +0000 Message-ID: <201203121643.26133.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1331476406-9844-1-git-send-email-jm@lentin.co.uk> <201203120811.23137.arnd@arndb.de> <20120312161004.GB5050@titan.lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120312161004.GB5050-u4khhh1J0LxI1Ri9qeTfzeTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Jason Cooper Cc: Jamie Lentin , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Monday 12 March 2012, Jason Cooper wrote: > Okay, that's what smelled funny. wdt and intc both only have registers > in virtual address space defined. Can I assume they map like everything > else to corresponding physical addresses? > > eg wdt@fed20300 -> wdt@f1020300 ? Yes, correct. Or just uses 20300 as the address if you remap everything using the ranges property. Arnd