From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F14E01363 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from giant.haxx.se (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2) with ESMTP id q2D8xtcC030194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:59:55 +0100 Received: (from bjst@localhost) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q2D8xtBQ030192; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:59:55 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:59:54 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Stenberg To: McClintock Matthew-B29882 Message-ID: <20120313085953.GA5754@giant> References: <1331567239-20200-1-git-send-email-bjst@enea.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "poky@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add pigz as gzip-native alternative. X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:00:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > I thought about doing this - can you share any performance numbers? pigz seems to scale fairly well. I compared the time it takes to compress the final rootfs tarball in do_rootfs for one of my images. gzip: real 1m33.523s user 1m33.146s sys 0m0.368s pigz: real 0m2.239s user 1m40.554s sys 0m0.716s This is on a 64-core machine. -- Björn