From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/35] Disintegrate asm/system.h for Hexagon [ver #2]
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:33:32 +0000
Message-ID: <201203131133.32241.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <201203130916.15118.arnd@arndb.de> <20120312233747.13888.75605.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <27808.1331632900@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-hexagon-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <27808.1331632900@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-hexagon-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, hpa@zytor.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday 13 March 2012, David Howells wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> 
> > Looking at this example, it could easily use the asm-generic versions of
> > switch_to.h and barrier.h, but that would complicate the dependency chain
> > again.
> 
> Yep.  The plan is to throw more patches on to the end of the series to
> consolidate those.
> 
> In fact, I wonder if we still really need the switch_to() macro wrapper, or
> whether we could replace it with an function, inline or otherwise, that
> returns the macro's third argument.

Sounds like a great idea, yes.

	Arnd