From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] c/r: prctl: Add ability to set new mm_struct::exe_file v3
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:43:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313154337.GA25711@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120313071812.GA6969@moon>
On 03/13, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> Matt, Oleg, there is a final version I hope,
> which should fit everyone.
Well, this version looks correct, but you are checking the same
condition twice, with the different comments. This is confusing.
> +static int prctl_set_mm_exe_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int fd)
> +{
> + struct file *exe_file;
> + struct dentry *dentry;
> + int err;
> +
> + /*
> + * Setting new mm::exe_file is only allowed
> + * when no VM_EXECUTABLE vma's left. This is
> + * a special C/R case when a restored program
> + * need to change own /proc/$pid/exe symlink.
> + * After this call mm::num_exe_file_vmas become
> + * meaningless.
> + */
> + if (mm->num_exe_file_vmas)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + exe_file = fget(fd);
> + if (!exe_file)
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + dentry = exe_file->f_path.dentry;
> +
> + /*
> + * Because the original mm->exe_file
> + * points to executable file, make sure
> + * this one is executable as well to not
> + * break an overall picture.
> + */
> + err = -EACCES;
> + if (!S_ISREG(dentry->d_inode->i_mode) ||
> + exe_file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOEXEC)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + err = inode_permission(dentry->d_inode, MAY_EXEC);
> + if (err)
> + goto exit;
> +
> + /*
> + * For security reason changing mm->exe_file
> + * is one-shot action.
> + */
> + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + if (likely(!mm->exe_file))
This means that the num_exe_file_vmas check at the start is not needed.
If you want it as a "fast-path" check, please fix the comment. Or just
remove it. Otherwise the code looks as if we have to check them both.
Matt, is it really possible to hit mm->exe_file = NULL in
removed_exe_file_vma ? Unless I missed something, this check just
hides the potentional problem, no?
IOW, shouldn't it do
void removed_exe_file_vma(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
WARN_ON(!mm->exe_file);
WARN_ON(mm->num_exe_file_vmas <= 0);
if (!--mm->num_exe_file_vmas) {
fput(mm->exe_file);
mm->exe_file = NULL;
}
}
?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-08 16:51 [RFC] c/r: prctl: Add ability to set new mm_struct::exe_file v3 Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 18:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-08 19:03 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 19:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-08 19:25 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 19:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-08 19:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 21:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-09 12:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-09 12:57 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-09 13:35 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-09 13:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-09 14:13 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-09 14:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-09 14:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-09 15:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-09 15:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-09 22:02 ` Matt Helsley
2012-03-09 22:39 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-09 23:59 ` Matt Helsley
2012-03-10 7:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-13 2:45 ` Matt Helsley
2012-03-13 6:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-13 7:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-13 15:43 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-03-13 16:00 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-13 16:04 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-13 16:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-14 1:41 ` Matt Helsley
2012-03-14 5:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-14 22:21 ` Matt Helsley
2012-03-14 22:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-14 0:36 ` Matt Helsley
2012-03-09 21:46 ` Matt Helsley
2012-03-09 21:52 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 19:31 ` Kees Cook
2012-03-08 19:40 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 20:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-03-08 20:06 ` Kees Cook
2012-03-08 20:07 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 20:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-03-08 20:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 20:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-03-08 20:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 21:57 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 22:03 ` Kees Cook
2012-03-08 22:12 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-03-08 22:14 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120313154337.GA25711@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.