From: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Suggest pr_<level> over printk(KERN_<LEVEL>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:45:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120314134520.GA26524@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331730336.27389.70.camel@joe2Laptop>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:05:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Patchwork queues are pretty useless when patches entered
> do not have their status updated for long periods.
>
> The patch I sent in August 2011 shows "new" rather than
> have an appropriate status.
>
> If you actually use patchwork, though it seems you don't,
> I think you should just mark every patch that's new as
> rejected and start over.
I use it, but not in the way you think I should be using it. Your not
getting to your will on other kernel developers is what this thread is
all all about, ultimately.
I don't get to work on ext4 full time, and so every minute I put on it
has to not a be a waste of time. This includes updating status
messages for patches that aren't obviously not applicable, or
superceded, but rather something that I might get to look at later.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-14 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-02 2:55 pull request: bluetooth-next 2012-03-01 Gustavo Padovan
2012-03-02 3:16 ` David Miller
2012-03-02 3:23 ` David Miller
2012-03-02 3:26 ` David Miller
2012-03-02 4:13 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-02 5:35 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Add --strict tests for braces, comments and casts Joe Perches
2012-03-02 5:54 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Add --strict test for strings split across multiple lines Joe Perches
2012-03-13 6:23 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Suggest pr_<level> over printk(KERN_<LEVEL> Joe Perches
2012-03-13 12:05 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-13 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-13 22:01 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-13 22:03 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-14 0:31 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-14 0:47 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-14 1:07 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-14 1:17 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-14 2:19 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-14 2:31 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-14 2:41 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-14 3:01 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-14 12:34 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-03-14 13:05 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-14 13:45 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2012-03-14 14:06 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-02 16:37 ` pull request: bluetooth-next 2012-03-01 Gustavo Padovan
2012-03-02 21:15 ` David Miller
2012-03-03 16:46 ` Gustavo Padovan
2012-03-03 19:46 ` David Miller
2012-03-03 19:47 ` David Miller
2012-03-03 20:04 ` Joe Perches
2012-03-03 20:06 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120314134520.GA26524@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.