From: Karsten Keil <kkeil@linux-pingi.de>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.3-rc6 netjet.ko sleeping while in atomic.
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:48:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120315084840.GA20202@gw.linux-pingi.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120314191650.GB18135@digium.com>
Thanks for the report.
I will have a look on this.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:16:50PM -0500, Shaun Ruffell wrote:
> Karsten,
>
> I hit this today when unloading netjet.ko which was attached to a
> Digium TDM400 card. Looks like flush_work_sync() is called while in
> a spin_lock_irqsave() block. Not sure if it matters to you but I
> thought I would send it along:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2445
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 30652, name: modprobe
> 3 locks held by modprobe/30652:
> #0: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c0669fd2>] driver_detach+0x37/0x95
> #1: (&__lockdep_no_validate__){......}, at: [<c0669fde>] driver_detach+0x43/0x95
> #2: (&(&card->lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<fa6f4657>] nj_release+0x14b/0x1b0 [netjet]
> irq event stamp: 4262
> hardirqs last enabled at (4261): [<c0476648>] debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x7a/0x138
> hardirqs last disabled at (4262): [<c07be2ea>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x18/0x7f
> softirqs last enabled at (1564): [<c0430cc1>] __do_softirq+0x10c/0x2fe
> softirqs last disabled at (1517): [<c04040b2>] call_on_stack+0x12/0x18
> Pid: 30652, comm: modprobe Tainted: G O 3.3.0-rc6.sruffelldbg+ #35
> Call Trace:
> [<c04542ce>] __might_sleep+0x10b/0x197
> [<c0444df1>] start_flush_work+0x26/0x132
> [<c0474b1c>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x18/0x92
> [<c0444f19>] flush_work_sync+0x1c/0x50
> [<c0474442>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x68/0xca
> [<c07beb5f>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x4c
> [<c0474ba1>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd
> [<c07beb5f>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x4c
> [<c06fe174>] ? skb_dequeue+0x47/0x52
> [<fa63824c>] mISDN_freedchannel+0x5e/0x63 [mISDN_core]
> [<fa69509a>] isac_release+0x9a/0xc0 [mISDNipac]
> [<fa6f4683>] nj_release+0x177/0x1b0 [netjet]
> [<c044fea8>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5c/0x89
> [<fa6f5ad7>] nj_remove+0x17/0x2f [netjet]
> [<c05e4bd4>] pci_device_remove+0x1e/0x3f
> [<c06698fa>] __device_release_driver+0x4e/0x96
> [<c066a02c>] driver_detach+0x91/0x95
> [<c0668bce>] bus_remove_driver+0x6e/0xcf
> [<c066a399>] driver_unregister+0x42/0x6c
> [<c066a593>] ? driver_remove_file+0x14/0x16
> [<c05e4924>] pci_unregister_driver+0x2d/0x78
> [<fa6f5ab5>] nj_cleanup+0xd/0x18 [netjet]
> [<c04833c8>] sys_delete_module+0x123/0x219
> [<c045be28>] ? local_clock+0x29/0x42
> [<c049586d>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x2a4/0x440
> [<c07c468c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
>
> Cheers,
> Shaun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-15 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-14 19:16 3.3-rc6 netjet.ko sleeping while in atomic Shaun Ruffell
2012-03-15 8:48 ` Karsten Keil [this message]
2012-03-15 10:07 ` Francois Romieu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120315084840.GA20202@gw.linux-pingi.de \
--to=kkeil@linux-pingi.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.