From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030940Ab2COPhx (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:37:53 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:58123 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030469Ab2COPhv (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:37:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:37:47 -0700 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/ub: deprecate & schedule for removal the "Low Performance USB Block" driver Message-ID: <20120315153747.GA23515@kroah.com> References: <1331758372-9851-1-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> <20120315093331.6472333e@lembas.zaitcev.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120315093331.6472333e@lembas.zaitcev.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 09:33:31AM -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:52:51 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > +What: Low Performance USB Block driver ("CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB") > > +When: 3.6 > > ACK > > > + does not use libusual which holds various workarounds for > > + certain buggy devices. > > Although the above is false, and ub actually started libusual, > I don't mind. It's a transient notice anyway. Once ub is gone, > libusual can be folded back into usb-storage. Good point. Sebastian, care to reword this and resend it? Also, are you going to be doing the "merge libusual into usb-storage" after you remove the ub driver? thanks, greg k-h