From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1031758Ab2COQh4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:37:56 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f52.google.com ([209.85.210.52]:65086 "EHLO
	mail-pz0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1031645Ab2COQhx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:37:53 -0400
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:37:49 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Chris Frey <cdfrey@foursquare.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.0.24
Message-ID: <20120315163749.GA25001@kroah.com>
References: <20120312203451.GA16773@kroah.com>
 <20120315162322.GA26005@foursquare.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120315162322.GA26005@foursquare.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:23:22PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:34:51PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > I'm announcing the release of the 3.0.24 kernel.
> > 
> > All users of the 3.0 kernel series must upgrade.
> 
> Is the word "must" defined anywhere?

Surely you have a dictionary somewhere?

> When I read it, it looks like there are serious patches included in
> this release, perhaps data integrity or security patches.  But "must"
> has been in an awful lot of these release notes lately, that it makes
> me wonder if it is boilerplate.
> 
> Just curious how to interpret this.

Interpret it as written please.

thanks,

greg k-h