From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760012Ab2COSKw (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:10:52 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([85.10.199.196]:40546 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756041Ab2COSKt (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:10:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:10:45 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Pete Zaitcev , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/ub: deprecate & schedule for removal the "Low Performance USB Block" driver Message-ID: <20120315181045.GB5702@breakpoint.cc> References: <1331758372-9851-1-git-send-email-sebastian@breakpoint.cc> <20120315093331.6472333e@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <20120315153747.GA23515@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120315153747.GA23515@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Although the above is false, and ub actually started libusual, > > I don't mind. It's a transient notice anyway. Once ub is gone, > > libusual can be folded back into usb-storage. > > Good point. > > Sebastian, care to reword this and resend it? I want clarify one thing but sure. > Also, are you going to be doing the "merge libusual into usb-storage" > after you remove the ub driver? This sounds like once ub is out, you have to merge those two :) So yes, unless a use case for it comes up. > thanks, > > greg k-h Sebastian