From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S8EXl-00013T-VL for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:32:54 +0100 Received: from eb-e6520 (unknown [82.240.38.71]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0504B012C for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:24:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:24:04 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20120315182404.0e1ade97@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: <4F6223D4.3020100@dynamicdevices.co.uk> References: <4F610B38.5060309@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <4F6219FC.7010506@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <4F622053.50202@dynamicdevices.co.uk> <20120315181021.56883348@eb-e6520> <4F6223D4.3020100@dynamicdevices.co.uk> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: oe-core layer including support for i.MX28 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:32:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:16:04 +0000, Alex J Lennon a =E9crit : >=20 > >I think the first solution is better and that custom boards should be=20 > added to custom layers >=20 > Hmmm ok, thanks That being the case it may be better for me to migrate=20 > my recipes from > the oe-classic codebase into a new layer created from scratch. It'll be=20 > quicker and easier for > me that way but perhaps less generic. >=20 that was just a suggestion. meta-fsl-arm maintainers can have differents opinions ;-) > (Although my understanding was that Freescale have no intention of=20 > providing Linux support related > to OpenEmbedded at this time? Or at least that's what they are telling= =20 > me :) >=20 that's not surprising. Eric --=20 http://eukrea.com/en/news/104-2012