From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] autoconf: change python configure testing Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:24:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20120316132447.GA9661@aepfle.de> References: <6688425179fdf1fb39f3.1329999209@debian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6688425179fdf1fb39f3.1329999209@debian.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Roger Pau Monne Cc: ian.jackson@citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Feb 23, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > autoconf: change python configure testing Unrelated to this actual change: While I was playing with the enable/disable-feature stuff I noticed that $(PYTHON) is only set with --enable-pythontools. As a result some of the usage failed because the variable was not set. Since libxl (for example) depends on PYTHON, is it really well thought to not set $(PYTHON) when --disable-pythontools is specified? What would be the usecase for that? Olaf