From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755389Ab2CPS5w (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:57:52 -0400 Received: from mailfw02.zoner.fi ([84.34.147.249]:53743 "EHLO mailfw02.zoner.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754794Ab2CPS5v (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:57:51 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 603 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:57:50 EDT Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:47:37 +0200 From: Lasse Collin To: "Jan Beulich" Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] xz: make use of BCJ filter also for 32-bit x86 kernel Message-ID: <20120316204737.23aacd2b@tukaani.org> In-Reply-To: <4F621C930200007800078B9E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> References: <4F621C930200007800078B9E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2012-03-15 Jan Beulich wrote: > The ARCH value for 32-bit x86 is not x86, but i?86. Thanks for noticing this. Is ARCH even the correct variable to use? Maybe SRCARCH would be better. Then it would be enough to test for x86, if I understand the toplevel Makefile correctly. On SPARC, it seems to be possible that ARCH is sparc32 or sparc64 while SRCARCH is always sparc, so currently xz_wrap.sh seems to be buggy on SPARC too. -- Lasse Collin | IRC: Larhzu @ IRCnet & Freenode