From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([129.241.93.19]:48161 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030194Ab2CSOHp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:07:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:07:42 +0100 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Various nits, fixes and hacks for mantis CA support on SMP Message-ID: <20120319140742.GC8239@uio.no> References: <20120228010330.GA25786@uio.no> <4F673D16.7010802@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F673D16.7010802@redhat.com> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:05:10AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > A "conglomerate of patches" can't be applied upstream. Instead, you should > be sending us a patch series, preserving the original author/signed-off-by > for each one, if the patches were nod written by you, and add your > Signed-off-by: at the end of each patch. This is true. I was, however, mainly looking for feedback -- it seems there is very little interest, though. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/