From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757481Ab2CSWPL (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:15:11 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:53530 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756989Ab2CSWPI (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:15:08 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:15:07 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: LKML , Oleg Nesterov , KOSAKI Motohiro , Pavel Emelyanov , Kees Cook , Tejun Heo , Matt Helsley Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] c/r: prctl: Add ability to set new mm_struct::exe_file Message-Id: <20120319151507.93bab32a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120316210343.925446961@openvz.org> References: <20120316205556.595309230@openvz.org> <20120316210343.925446961@openvz.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:55:57 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > When we do restore we would like to have a way to setup > a former mm_struct::exe_file so that /proc/pid/exe would > point to the original executable file a process had at > checkpoint time. > > For this the PR_SET_MM_EXE_FILE code is introduced. > This option takes a file descriptor which will be > set as a source for new /proc/$pid/exe symlink. > > Note it allows to change /proc/$pid/exe iif there > are no VM_EXECUTABLE vmas present for current process, > simply because this feature is a special to C/R > and mm::num_exe_file_vmas become meaningless after > that. > > Also this action is one-shot only. For security reason > we don't allow to change the symlink several times. What is this mysterious "security reason"? > > ... > > +static int prctl_set_mm_exe_file(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int fd) > +{ > + struct file *exe_file; > + struct dentry *dentry; > + int err; > + > + /* > + * Setting new mm::exe_file is only allowed > + * when no VM_EXECUTABLE vma's left. So make > + * a fast test first. > + */ > + if (mm->num_exe_file_vmas) > + return -EBUSY; > + > + exe_file = fget(fd); > + if (!exe_file) > + return -EBADF; > + > + dentry = exe_file->f_path.dentry; > + > + /* > + * Because the original mm->exe_file > + * points to executable file, make sure > + * this one is executable as well to not > + * break an overall picture. > + */ > + err = -EACCES; > + if (!S_ISREG(dentry->d_inode->i_mode) || > + exe_file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOEXEC) > + goto exit; > + > + err = inode_permission(dentry->d_inode, MAY_EXEC); > + if (err) > + goto exit; > + > + /* > + * For security reason changing mm->exe_file > + * is one-shot action. > + */ It should be explained here also. The comment is pretty useless - if we don't tell people what this "security reason" is, how can future developers be sure that they aren't violating it? > + down_write(&mm->mmap_sem); > + if (likely(!mm->exe_file)) > + set_mm_exe_file(mm, exe_file); > + else > + err = -EBUSY; > + up_write(&mm->mmap_sem); > + > +exit: > + fput(exe_file); > + return err; > +} > + > static int prctl_set_mm(int opt, unsigned long addr, > unsigned long arg4, unsigned long arg5) > { > > ... >