From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 19 (uml) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:44:51 +0000 Message-ID: <20120319164451.GI6589@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20120319184830.fce597a16eaf7206195a7a45@canb.auug.org.au> <4F674A2D.5080504@xenotime.net> <4F675B78.8060300@nod.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:33306 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030659Ab2CSQo5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:44:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F675B78.8060300@nod.at> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Richard Weinberger Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 05:14:48PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Looks like this commit introduced the issue: > > commit 1ed71e0439cba3609d3c69bf04795e0389cd35e4 > Author: Al Viro > Date: Thu Feb 23 01:33:19 2012 -0500 > > um: embed ->stub_pages[] into mmu_context > > seriously, kmalloc() for two-element array of pointers? > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro > > The size of struct page is not known to all users of asm/mmu.h Aaargh... Dumb braino, fixed in the local queue back in Feb 25, fix not folded into commit and missed on cherry-pick ;-/ It's struct page *stub_pages[2]; of course... OK, fix properly folded into that sucker, for-next repushed.