From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
To: "Michael J. Wang" <mjwang@broadcom.com>
Cc: "mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scheduler: minor improvement to pick_next_highest_task_rt in linux-3.3
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:40:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120321014050.GA19766@zhy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2EF88150C0EF2C43A218742ED384C1BC0FC83D6B@IRVEXCHMB08.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:26:19PM +0000, Michael J. Wang wrote:
> From: Michael J Wang <mjwang@broadcom.com>
>
> Avoid extra work by continuing on to the next rt_rq if the highest prio task in current rt_rq is the same priority as our candidate task.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael J Wang <mjwang@broadcom.com>
>
> ---
>
> More detailed explanation: if next is not NULL, then we have found a candidate task, and its priority is next->prio. Now we are looking for an even higher priority task in the other rt_rq's. idx is the highest priority in the current candidate rt_rq. In the current 3.3 code, if idx is equal to next->prio, we would start scanning the tasks in that rt_rq and replace the current candidate task with a task from that rt_rq. But the new task would only have a priority that is equal to our previous candidate task, so we have not advanced our goal of finding a higher prio task. So we should avoid the extra work by continuing on to the next rt_rq if idx is equal to next->prio.
>
You should limit characters of each line to 80 if possible.
And before sending you patch, linux-source/scripts/checkpatch.pl maybe
give you some clues whether there is some warning/error. If there are,
fix them.
Only for what your patch wants to show:
Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Thanks,
Yong
> --- linux-3.3/kernel/sched/rt.c.orig 2012-03-18 16:15:34.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-3.3/kernel/sched/rt.c 2012-03-19 14:52:54.585391702 -0700
> @@ -1403,7 +1403,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_hig
> next_idx:
> if (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
> continue;
> - if (next && next->prio < idx)
> + if (next && next->prio <= idx)
> continue;
> list_for_each_entry(rt_se, array->queue + idx, run_list) {
> struct task_struct *p;
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Only stand for myself
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-21 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 22:26 [PATCH 1/1] scheduler: minor improvement to pick_next_highest_task_rt in linux-3.3 Michael J. Wang
2012-03-20 13:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-21 1:40 ` Yong Zhang [this message]
2012-03-21 1:56 ` Michael J. Wang
2012-03-21 2:12 ` Yong Zhang
2012-03-21 7:49 ` Michael J. Wang
2012-03-21 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-21 18:33 ` Michael J. Wang
2012-03-21 19:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-22 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-27 15:35 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/rt: Improve pick_next_highest_task_rt() tip-bot for Michael J Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120321014050.GA19766@zhy \
--to=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mjwang@broadcom.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.