From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAeil-0005gQ-UL for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:54:16 +0100 Received: from eb-e6520 (unknown [82.233.81.124]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2F6A617D for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:45:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:45:17 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20120322104517.0600295f@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: References: <1332339451-26902-1-git-send-email-s.stirtzel@googlemail.com> <20120322092859.GE4010@jama.jama.net> <20120322104009.6a4ed04e@eb-e6520> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [meta-oe] giflib: Move to OE-Core X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:54:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:42:33 +0100, Koen Kooi a =E9crit : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Op 22-03-12 10:40, Eric B=E9nard schreef: > > Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:35:31 +0100, Samuel Stirtzel > > a =E9crit : > >> 2012/3/22 Martin Jansa : > >>> why not add meta-oe dependency to meta-kde/README? > >>=20 > >> It is already listed as dependency [1]. But somehow it seems like that > >> there are users, interested in testing this layer, with an use case > >> which excludes the meta-oe layer. > >>=20 > >>=20 > > can you describe this use case so that meta-oe gets a chance to adapt. > >=20 > > One problem I can see with meta-oe is the fact that it makes changes to= =20 > > the oe-core toolchain : that would be great to put all the toolchain=20 > > changes in a meta-toolchain (but I think that's what is scheduled with= =20 > > meta-linaro). >=20 > In the mean time I bet Khem would love to have people sending patches to > move the toolchain bits to a meta-toolchain layer inside the > meta-openembedded repo. >=20 ok so expect patches by this weekend for this point. Eric