From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.3]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SAf8k-0008Qy-J7 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:21:06 +0100 Received: from eb-e6520 (unknown [82.233.81.124]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030E9A6265 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:12:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:12:08 +0100 From: Eric =?ISO-8859-1?B?QuluYXJk?= To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20120322111208.4530c234@eb-e6520> In-Reply-To: <20120322100758.GG4010@jama.jama.net> References: <1332410499-18183-1-git-send-email-koen@dominion.thruhere.net> <20120322100758.GG4010@jama.jama.net> Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RXVrculh?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.8; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC][meta-oe][meta-toolchain][PATCH] meta-toolchain: populate with gcc and binutils from meta-oe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:21:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:07:58 +0100, Martin Jansa a =E9crit : > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:01:39AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi >=20 > Why not move them? >=20 > Or create stub of meta-toolchain in 1st patch for people to add it to > bblayers and then move it in 2nd. >=20 > If it was copied just that people doesn't have to=20 > update bblayers at the same time as git pull from meta-oe. >=20 I think the next step is a patch removing them from meta-oe to make the change less intrusive than a one shot move and give people the time to update their bblayers.conf. Eric