From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
To: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Cc: eparis@redhat.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] fsnotify: change locking order
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:51:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120326225122.GA3296@Neptun> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120326152742.GA3124@zeus>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:27:42PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
>
> No problem, and thank you for the update. I guess this is the sort of
> patches that actually requires a good amount of testing on -next, so
> it makes sense to wait for next window.
>
I totally agree. Better to have this in linux-next for a while and make
sure that no nasty side effects have been introduced.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-26 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-14 15:29 [PATCH 0/9] fsnotify: change locking order Lino Sanfilippo
2011-06-14 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/9] inotify, fanotify: replace fsnotify_put_group() with fsnotify_destroy_group() Lino Sanfilippo
2011-06-14 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/9] fsnotify: introduce fsnotify_get_group() Lino Sanfilippo
2011-06-14 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/9] fsnotify: use reference counting for groups Lino Sanfilippo
2011-06-14 15:29 ` [PATCH 4/9] fsnotify: take groups mark_lock before mark lock Lino Sanfilippo
2011-06-14 15:29 ` [PATCH 5/9] fanotify: add an extra flag to mark_remove_from_mask that indicates wheather a mark should be destroyed Lino Sanfilippo
2011-06-14 15:29 ` [PATCH 6/9] fsnotify: use a mutex instead of a spinlock to protect a groups mark list Lino Sanfilippo
2011-06-14 15:29 ` [PATCH 7/9] fsnotify: pass group to fsnotify_destroy_mark() Lino Sanfilippo
2011-06-14 15:29 ` [PATCH 8/9] fsnotify: introduce locked versions of fsnotify_add_mark() and fsnotify_remove_mark() Lino Sanfilippo
2011-06-14 15:29 ` [PATCH 9/9] fsnotify: dont put marks on temporary list when clearing marks by group Lino Sanfilippo
2011-08-01 20:38 ` [PATCH 0/9] fsnotify: change locking order Eric Paris
2011-08-11 23:13 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2012-03-20 18:49 ` Luis Henriques
2012-03-20 18:58 ` Eric Paris
2012-03-20 19:05 ` Luis Henriques
2012-03-22 22:14 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2012-03-26 11:27 ` Luis Henriques
2012-03-26 15:12 ` Eric Paris
2012-03-26 15:27 ` Luis Henriques
2012-03-26 22:51 ` Lino Sanfilippo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120326225122.GA3296@Neptun \
--to=linosanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luis.henriques@canonical.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.