From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from tango.0pointer.de ([85.214.72.216]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SCTDt-0000W2-Ix for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:01:54 +0000 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:01:36 +0200 From: Lennart Poettering Subject: Re: Doing kexec reboot right in systemd Message-ID: <20120327100132.GA15921@tango.0pointer.de> References: <20120322223646.GC26794@verge.net.au> <20120326180729.GB5398@tango.0pointer.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: Marti Raudsepp Cc: systemd-devel , Simon Horman , kexec list On Mon, 26.03.12 21:25, Marti Raudsepp (marti@juffo.org) wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 21:07, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > Marti, sorry for changing my mind on this: would be great if you could > > prep a patch for this for systemd itself. > > D'oh, I already prepared a patch for kexec, although I haven't sent it > out yet. OK, I am fine with either. > > Hmm, so since this would then belong in the shutdown path of systemd, > > and only be added for the kexec shutdown path I actually think it would > > make more sense to add this into systemd itself instead of kexec-tools, > > to ensure the right ordering. > > Um, why is including in systemd necessary for guaranteeing order? It isn't, but it's easier to keep early boot and late shutdown stuff in systemd. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec