From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: no-carrier on qlogic 8242 10gig with linux 3.x running xen Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:37:12 -0400 Message-ID: <20120328143712.GG18161@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <1332840330.2485.70.camel@leeds.uk.xensource.com> <1332841414026-5597400.post@n5.nabble.com> <1332842573.2485.88.camel@leeds.uk.xensource.com> <20120327124113.GP12984@reaktio.net> <1332865415525-5598276.post@n5.nabble.com> <20120327192644.GQ12984@reaktio.net> <1332880165775-5598838.post@n5.nabble.com> <1332883903167-5598955.post@n5.nabble.com> <20120327215159.GA17203@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1332887727951-5599061.post@n5.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1332887727951-5599061.post@n5.nabble.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Kristoffer Harthing Egefelt Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 03:35:27PM -0700, Kristoffer Harthing Egefelt wrote: > Strange - theres is no irq 38. > There is irq 1-21 and 304-440. > > Looking at /proc/interrupts eth0 have irq 431 and eth1 have irq 435. Can you attach the /proc/interrupts please - for both Xen and baremetal. > > Should there be a irq 38? No. It is much further up. > I don't really understand the gsi -> irq mapping... > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/no-carrier-on-qlogic-8242-10gig-with-linux-3-x-running-xen-tp5597283p5599061.html > Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel