From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@google.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>,
Justin Teravest <teravest@google.com>,
Laurent Chavey <chavey@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] trace: trace syscall in its handler not from ptrace handler
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:20:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120329062031.GB1376@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL26m8+zbbqngfK0fYb+A2UBQ1fZ9Uxrf4VLWqU1VuMzkcF4xw@mail.gmail.com>
* Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:43 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> > But instead you add a penalty for every syscall, even if tracing is
> > disabled. Not cool.
>
> I just ran a small test binary which calls syscall(SYS_getuid) in a
> tight loop and calculates the latency per syscall.
>
> Without my patch: it is 70 ns/call
> With my patch: it is 83 ns/call
>
> So yes, it does add a bit of latency to the syscall even if
> tracing is disabled. I wonder if I can change the redirection
> function so that it doesn't add so much latency.
There's a really simple rule for anything tracing/debugging
related: and syscalls don't add *ANY* kind of latency to the
non-tracing case. That is true of the current syscall tracing
bits, they work via a TIF flag and don't add any latency.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-29 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-26 18:39 [PATCH 0/6] Enhance and speed up syscall tracing Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-26 18:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] trace: syscalls.h - cleanup and simplify SYSCALL_METADATA() Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-26 18:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] trace: add support for 32 bit compat syscalls on x86_64 Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-27 4:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-28 21:10 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-28 21:11 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-28 23:00 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-26 18:39 ` [PATCH 3/6] trace: Refactor ftrace syscall macros to make them more readable Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-26 18:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] trace: trace syscall in its handler not from ptrace handler Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-27 5:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-28 18:23 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-29 2:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-29 2:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-03-29 3:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-29 3:02 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-29 3:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-29 6:20 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-03-29 19:02 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-29 19:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-29 19:43 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-29 20:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-29 22:40 ` David Sharp
2012-03-29 22:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-30 12:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-30 11:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-03-29 22:44 ` David Sharp
2012-03-29 22:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-26 18:39 ` [PATCH 5/6] trace: raw_syscalls: Mark compat syscalls in the MSB of the syscall number Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2012-03-26 18:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] trace: get rid of the enabled_*_syscalls bitmaps Vaibhav Nagarnaik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120329062031.GB1376@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=chavey@google.com \
--cc=dhsharp@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=teravest@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vnagarnaik@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.